Radeon Graphics vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 620 with Radeon Graphics, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 620
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.43
+22.1%

HD Graphics 620 outperforms Graphics by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking843902
Place by popularity588
Power efficiency11.159.13
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192448
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0042.00
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs38
TMUs2428

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4System Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.43
+22.1%
Radeon Graphics 1.99

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 620 935
+22.4%
Radeon Graphics 764

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
+30%
10−12
−30%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Elden Ring 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 10
+25%
8−9
−25%
Elden Ring 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Fortnite 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
World of Tanks 43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 24
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
World of Tanks 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Valorant 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Elden Ring 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 1−2 0−1
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 620 is 30% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 1.99
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

HD Graphics 620 has a 22.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The HD Graphics 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2750 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6543 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.