ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs HD Graphics 620

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking	846	1534
Place by popularity	66	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.15	no data
Architecture	Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)	Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name	Kaby Lake GT2	RV280
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	30 August 2016 (8 years ago)	1 March 2003 (21 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	300 MHz	200 MHz
Boost clock speed	1000 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	189 million	36 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm++	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.00	0.8
Floating-point processing power	0.384 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	4
TMUs	24	4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	64 MB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	166 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	2.656 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

+

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	8.1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	1.4
OpenCL	3.0	N/A
Vulkan	+	N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

---

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

13

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	30 August 2016	1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	64 MB
Chip lithography	14 nm	150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	28 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---