Radeon R5 230 OEM vs HD Graphics 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking979not rated
Place by popularity71not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 8 Broadwell (2014−2015)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2Caicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2015 (9 years ago)21 December 2013 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24160
Core clock speed300 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rate22.805.000
Floating-point performance0.3648 gflops0.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1334 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data10.67 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.44.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 January 2015 21 December 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 19 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 26.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 5500 and Radeon R5 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5500 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 230 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500
AMD Radeon R5 230 OEM
Radeon R5 230 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1489 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 19 votes

Rate Radeon R5 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.