GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) vs HD Graphics 5500

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5500 and GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 5500
2014
15 Watt
1.30
+381%

HD Graphics 5500 outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9871329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.851.78
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)no data
GPU code nameBroadwell GT2MCP79MX
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 September 2014 (10 years ago)14 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19216
Core clock speed300 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed850 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million282 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate20.40no data
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)10.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 5500 1.30
+381%
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 0.27

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 5500 4798
+690%
9400M (G) / ION (LE) 607

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Full HD11
+450%
2−3
−450%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Valorant 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Fortnite 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Grand Theft Auto V 4 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2
−100%
4−5
+100%
Valorant 35−40
+34.6%
24−27
−34.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Valorant 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3 0−1

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how HD Graphics 5500 and 9400M (G) / ION (LE) compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5500 is 550% faster in 900p
  • HD Graphics 5500 is 450% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the HD Graphics 5500 is 333% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5500 is ahead in 24 tests (86%)
  • 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is ahead in 1 test (4%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.30 0.27
Recency 5 September 2014 14 October 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has a 381.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

9400M (G) / ION (LE), on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 5500
HD Graphics 5500
NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1690 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5500 or GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.