TITAN V CEO Edition vs HD Graphics 530

Place in the ranking	816	83
Place by popularity	97	not in top-100
Power efficiency	11.94	12.17
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code name	Skylake GT2	GV100
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	21 June 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	5120
Core clock speed	350 MHz	1200 MHz
Boost clock speed	950 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	22.80	465.6
Floating-point processing power	0.3648 TFLOPS	14.9 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	128
TMUs	24	320
Tensor Cores	no data	640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	4096 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	848 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	868.4 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	-	7.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 530 2.59

TITAN V CEO Edition 44.03
+1600%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 530 1001

TITAN V CEO Edition 16987
+1597%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	13 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
4K	7 −1471%	110−120 +1471%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−1600%

85−90
+1600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1567%	350−400 +1567%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −1479%	600−650 +1479%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1567%	350−400 +1567%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −1536%	180−190 +1536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −1479%	600−650 +1479%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −1567%	100−105 +1567%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1600%	85−90 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −1592%	220−230 +1592%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −1567%	350−400 +1567%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −1536%	180−190 +1536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −1479%	600−650 +1479%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−1567%

100−105

+1567%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −1525%	65−70 +1525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1567%	50−55 +1567%
Hitman 3	8−9 −1525%	130−140 +1525%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1471%	110−120 +1471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −1567%	250−260 +1567%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−1567%

100−105

+1567%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −1400%	30−33 +1400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−1525%

65−70
+1525%

This is how HD Graphics 530 and TITAN V CEO Edition compete in popular games:

TITAN V CEO Edition is 1592% faster in 1080p
TITAN V CEO Edition is 1471% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.59	44.03
Recency	1 September 2015	21 June 2018
Maximum RAM amount	64 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	250 Watt

HD Graphics 530 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

TITAN V CEO Edition, on the other hand, has a 1600% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN V CEO Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 530 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 530 is a notebook card while TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.