ATI Radeon X1800 GTO vs HD Graphics 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking865not rated
Place by popularity36not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Skylake (2015−2016)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameSkylake GT2R520
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speed300 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million321 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate25.206.000
Floating-point performance0.4032 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data990 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data31.68 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 520 831
+494%
ATI X1800 GTO 140

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 1 March 2006
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 48 Watt

HD Graphics 520 has an age advantage of 9 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 520 and Radeon X1800 GTO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 520 is a notebook card while Radeon X1800 GTO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 520
HD Graphics 520
ATI Radeon X1800 GTO
Radeon X1800 GTO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2825 votes

Rate HD Graphics 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11 votes

Rate Radeon X1800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.