Radeon R5 430 OEM vs HD Graphics 510

Place in the ranking	952	801
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	7.43	3.70
Architecture	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)	GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code name	Skylake GT1	Oland
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)	30 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	384
Core clock speed	300 MHz	730 MHz
Boost clock speed	900 MHz	780 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm+	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	10.80	18.72
Floating-point processing power	0.1728 TFLOPS	0.599 TFLOPS
ROPs	3	8
TMUs	12	24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	LPDDR3/DDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1150 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	36.8 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 510 1.61

R5 430 OEM 2.67
+65.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 510 622

R5 430 OEM 1031
+65.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−50%

3−4
+50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Hitman 3	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−50%

6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

+0%

1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−33.3%

4−5
+33.3%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.61	2.67
Recency	1 September 2015	30 June 2016
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt