ATI Radeon 7500 LE vs HD Graphics 510

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1028not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.65no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.0 (2015−2016)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameSkylake GT1RV200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 September 2015 (10 years ago)14 August 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed300 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million60 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate10.801.500
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs126

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amount32 GB64 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared175 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.6 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2015 14 August 2001
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

HD Graphics 510 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 510 and Radeon 7500 LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 510 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7500 LE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 420 votes

Rate HD Graphics 510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon 7500 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 510 or Radeon 7500 LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.