FirePro M2000 vs HD Graphics 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 5000 with FirePro M2000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 5000
2013
30 Watt
1.41
+38.2%

HD Graphics 5000 outperforms M2000 by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10411155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.622.38
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameHaswell GT3Turks
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date27 May 2013 (12 years ago)1 July 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores320480
Core clock speed200 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,300 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt33 Watt
Texture fill rate40.0012.00
Floating-point processing power0.64 TFLOPS0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Form factorno datachip-down

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs
StereoOutput3D-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.34.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+N/A

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 5000 1.41
+38.2%
FirePro M2000 1.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5000 590
+38.2%
Samples: 1193
FirePro M2000 427
Samples: 124

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 5000 1034
+22.9%
FirePro M2000 841

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 5000 4277
+8.1%
FirePro M2000 3956

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12−14
+33.3%
9
−33.3%
Full HD11
−45.5%
16
+45.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Valorant 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+28%
24−27
−28%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 4
+100%
2−3
−100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+20%
14−16
−20%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Valorant 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 5000 and FirePro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5000 is 33% faster in 900p
  • FirePro M2000 is 45% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 5000 is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • HD Graphics 5000 performs better in 34 tests (89%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (11%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 1.02
Recency 27 May 2013 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 33 Watt

HD Graphics 5000 has a 38% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 months, a 82% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The HD Graphics 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5000 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M2000 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 199 votes

Rate HD Graphics 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate FirePro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 5000 or FirePro M2000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.