GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs HD Graphics 4400

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4400 with GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 4400
2013
20 Watt
1.33

RTX 3050 4 GB outperforms HD Graphics 4400 by a whopping 1212% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1029318
Place by popularitynot in top-10032
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data37.18
Power efficiency4.6713.62
ArchitectureGeneration 7.5 (2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GA107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2013 (11 years ago)27 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1602048
Core clock speed200 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speed950 MHz1740 MHz
Number of transistors392 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate19.00111.4
Floating-point processing power0.304 TFLOPS7.127 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs2064
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data242 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

HD Graphics 4400 1.33
RTX 3050 4 GB 17.45
+1212%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4400 522
RTX 3050 4 GB 6868
+1216%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−1150%
150−160
+1150%
Full HD10
−1200%
130−140
+1200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data1.53

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Fortnite 11
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
Valorant 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−1150%
50−55
+1150%
Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 27−30
−1107%
350−400
+1107%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Dota 2 15
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Valorant 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
Dota 2 16−18
−1194%
220−230
+1194%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1122%
110−120
+1122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1150%
75−80
+1150%
Valorant 30−35
−1076%
400−450
+1076%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Valorant 5−6
−1200%
65−70
+1200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1067%
35−40
+1067%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1167%
190−200
+1167%
Valorant 7−8
−1186%
90−95
+1186%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1100%
24−27
+1100%

This is how HD Graphics 4400 and RTX 3050 4 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 1150% faster in 900p
  • RTX 3050 4 GB is 1200% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 17.45
Recency 3 September 2013 27 January 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 90 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has 350% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 4 GB, on the other hand, has a 1212% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 175% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4400 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 4400 is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1486 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2709 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 4400 or GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.