GeForce 405M vs HD Graphics 4400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1024not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 7.5 Haswell (2012−2013)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameHaswell GT2GT218
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date5 June 2013 (11 years ago)11 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2016
CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed200 MHz606 MHz
Boost clock speed1100 MHzno data
Number of transistors392 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate22.004.848
Floating-point performance0.352 gflops0.03878 gflops
Gigaflopsno data73

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno dataUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0
Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 API
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.34.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.80N/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2013 11 May 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 14 Watt

HD Graphics 4400 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 81.8% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 405M, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 4400 and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4400
HD Graphics 4400
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1334 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.