ATI Radeon X800 vs HD Graphics 405

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1162not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.36no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1R430
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)1 October 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate9.6004.800
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPSno data
ROPs212
TMUs1612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared350 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.32.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 1 October 2004
Chip lithography 14 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 30 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 685.7% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and Radeon X800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook card while Radeon X800 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 405
HD Graphics 405
ATI Radeon X800
Radeon X800

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 200 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate Radeon X800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.