Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU vs HD Graphics 405

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.86no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Vega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1283584 ×2
Core clock speed200 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors189 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600224.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.1536 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs264 ×2
TMUs16224 ×2
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared2048 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan+1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 29 June 2017
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 230 Watt

HD Graphics 405 has 3733% lower power consumption.

Pro V320 MxGPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 405 and Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 405 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 281 votes

Rate HD Graphics 405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 405 or Radeon Pro V320 MxGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.