Radeon RX 6650M vs HD Graphics 4000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 4000 and Radeon RX 6650M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 4000
2012
1.18

RX 6650M outperforms HD Graphics 4000 by a whopping 3199% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1065116
Place by popularity42not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8322.61
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT2Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 May 2012 (12 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1281792
Core clock speed650 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors1,200 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown120 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00270.6
Floating-point processing power0.256 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs16112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.5
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 4000 1.18
RX 6650M 38.93
+3199%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 4000 454
RX 6650M 15018
+3208%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

HD Graphics 4000 523
RX 6650M 32846
+6180%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

HD Graphics 4000 480
RX 6650M 25739
+5262%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p12
−2817%
350−400
+2817%
Full HD10
−1080%
118
+1080%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4133%
127
+4133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−3433%
106
+3433%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−19000%
190−200
+19000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1057%
160−170
+1057%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1675%
140−150
+1675%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−300%
120−130
+300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2533%
79
+2533%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−19000%
190−200
+19000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1057%
160−170
+1057%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−2275%
190
+2275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−515%
80−85
+515%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−300%
120−130
+300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−1875%
75−80
+1875%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2033%
64
+2033%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−8300%
80−85
+8300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−19000%
190−200
+19000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−1283%
80−85
+1283%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−1057%
160−170
+1057%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−1988%
167
+1988%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−718%
90
+718%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−93.8%
62
+93.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−2850%
55−60
+2850%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−4100%
40−45
+4100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
Hitman 3 7−8
−614%
50−55
+614%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−2025%
85−90
+2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 55−60
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−3720%
190−200
+3720%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1575%
65−70
+1575%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 30−35

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2500%
24−27
+2500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 24−27
Far Cry 5 0−1 21−24

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 4000 and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 2817% faster in 900p
  • RX 6650M is 1080% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6650M is 19000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
  • there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.18 38.93
Recency 14 May 2012 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm

RX 6650M has a 3199.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 214.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 4000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 4000
HD Graphics 4000
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 5206 votes

Rate HD Graphics 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 95 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.