Radeon RX 6300M vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
400 400 (Braswell) 405 500 505 510 520 530 610 615 620 630
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6300M 6450M 6500 6500M 6550M 6550S 6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700M 6700S 6800M 6800S 6850M XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 400 and Radeon RX 6300M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 400
2015
8 GB DDR3L, 6 Watt
1.04

6300M outperforms HD Graphics 400 by a whopping 1376% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400
RX 6300M RX 6300M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.3533.77
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Navi 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 April 2015 (11 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96768
Core clock speed320 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed600 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate7.200115.2
Floating-point processing power0.1152 TFLOPS3.686 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x4
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data72 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan+1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.04 15.35
Recency 1 April 2015 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 35 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 483% lower power consumption.

RX 6300M, on the other hand, has a 1376% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6300M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 400 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400
vs
GT 720M GeForce GT 720M
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
vs
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
HD Graphics 400 HD Graphics 400
vs
HD 7650M Radeon HD 7650M
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
HD 6290 IGP 6290 IGP
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q 3080 Max-Q
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
R9 M290X Mac Edition M290X Mac Edition
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
GRID RTX T10-2 RTX T10-2
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
RTX 2060 12 GB 2060 12 GB
HD Graphics 400 Intel Graphics 400
vs
RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile 3000 Ada Generation Mobile
HD Graphics 405 Intel Graphics 405
vs
ATI X1800 XL X1800 XL
HD Graphics 405 Intel Graphics 405
vs
ATI X300 X300
HD Graphics 405 Intel Graphics 405
vs
ATI 9000 PRO Mac Edition 9000 PRO Mac Edition
HD Graphics 405 Intel Graphics 405
vs
ATI 9500 PRO 9500 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 14 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 400 or Radeon RX 6300M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.