Radeon RX 590 GME vs HD Graphics 400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1073not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Polaris 20
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)9 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962304
Core clock speed320 MHz1257 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1420 MHz
Number of transistors189 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate7.680204.5
Floating-point processing power0.1229 TFLOPS6.543 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs12144

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL2.02.1
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 9 March 2020
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 175 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 2816.7% lower power consumption.

RX 590 GME, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Radeon RX 590 GME. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
AMD Radeon RX 590 GME
Radeon RX 590 GME

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 404 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 532 votes

Rate Radeon RX 590 GME on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.