Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs HD Graphics 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1070not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.04no data
ArchitectureGeneration 8.0 (2014−2015)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameBraswell GT1Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 2015 (9 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9616384
Core clock speed320 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed640 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistors189 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt2400 Watt
Texture fill rate7.6801,638
Floating-point processing power0.1229 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs2no data
TMUs121024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3LHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1565 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.1.80N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2015 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 2400 Watt

HD Graphics 400 has 39900% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between HD Graphics 400 and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that HD Graphics 400 is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 400
HD Graphics 400
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 397 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.