Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs HD Graphics 3000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 1503% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1183433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores964
Core clock speed650 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1950 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology32 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate15.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12_2
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.58
+1503%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

HD Graphics 3000 2503
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 28417
+1036%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9
−200%
27
+200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−433%
30−35
+433%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
Hitman 3 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−550%
39
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−160%
24−27
+160%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−475%
21−24
+475%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1400%
45−50
+1400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−391%
50−55
+391%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−400%
30
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−60%
16
+60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1400%
14−16
+1400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%
Hitman 3 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−3000%
60−65
+3000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 200% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 30 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 10.58
Recency 1 February 2011 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 1503% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
Intel Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 2395 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.