Radeon RX 9060 XT vs HD Graphics 2500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 2500 and Radeon RX 9060 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

HD Graphics 2500
2012
0.64

9060 XT outperforms HD Graphics 2500 by a whopping 7505% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking125074
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.98
ArchitectureGeneration 7.0 (2012−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameIvy Bridge GT1Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 2012 (14 years ago)18 May 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482048
Core clock speed650 MHz2220 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz3230 MHz
Number of transistors392 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology22 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown150 Watt
Texture fill rate6.900413.4
Floating-point processing power0.1104 TFLOPS26.46 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs6128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data322.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.8
OpenGL4.04.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.801.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−7400%
600−650
+7400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7400%
2100−2150
+7400%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12
−7400%
900−950
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 12−14
−7400%
900−950
+7400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7400%
2100−2150
+7400%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Dota 2 12−14
−7400%
900−950
+7400%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−7400%
450−500
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7400%
2100−2150
+7400%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−7043%
500−550
+7043%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7400%
1050−1100
+7400%
Valorant 3−4
−7233%
220−230
+7233%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

This is how HD Graphics 2500 and RX 9060 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 9060 XT is 7400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 48.67
Recency 1 April 2012 18 May 2025
Chip lithography 22 nm 4 nm

RX 9060 XT has a 7505% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2500 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 1618 votes

Rate HD Graphics 2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 784 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about HD Graphics 2500 or Radeon RX 9060 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.