Radeon HD 6380G vs HD Graphics 2000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon HD 6380G, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
HD Graphics 2000 outperforms HD 6380G by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1236 | 1248 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.01 |
Power efficiency | no data | 1.02 |
Architecture | Generation 6.0 (2011) | TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | Sandy Bridge GT1 | SuperSumo |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 1 February 2011 (14 years ago) | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $399.99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 160 |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 400 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | no data |
Number of transistors | 189 million | 1,178 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | unknown | 35 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 8.100 | 3.200 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.1296 TFLOPS | 0.128 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 1 | 4 |
TMUs | 6 | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | System Shared | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory bus width | System Shared | System Shared |
Memory clock speed | System Shared | System Shared |
Shared memory | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | N/A | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 11
+10%
| 10−12
−10%
|
Cost per frame, $
1080p | no data | 40.00 |
FPS performance in popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 1440p
Epic Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset - 4K
Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
+6.3%
|
16−18
−6.3%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 0−1 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+14.3%
|
7−8
−14.3%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
+0%
|
4−5
+0%
|
Valorant | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 0−1 |
Fortnite | 1−2 | 0−1 |
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Valorant | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 1−2
+0%
|
1−2
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
Fortnite | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
This is how HD Graphics 2000 and HD 6380G compete in popular games:
- HD Graphics 2000 is 10% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD Graphics 2000 is 14% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- HD Graphics 2000 is ahead in 4 tests (13%)
- there's a draw in 26 tests (87%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.48 | 0.45 |
Recency | 1 February 2011 | 14 June 2011 |
HD Graphics 2000 has a 6.7% higher aggregate performance score.
HD 6380G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between HD Graphics 2000 and Radeon HD 6380G.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.