GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs HD Graphics 2000

Place in the ranking	1227	7
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	49.01
Power efficiency	no data	20.00
Architecture	Generation 6.0 (2011)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Sandy Bridge GT1	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	1 February 2011 (14 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	7680
Core clock speed	850 MHz	2310 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2610 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	285 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.100	626.4
Floating-point processing power	0.1296 TFLOPS	40.09 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	80
TMUs	6	240
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	285 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	12 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	504.2 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.54

RTX 4070 Ti 80.23
+14757%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 2000 213

RTX 4070 Ti 31777
+14819%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896

RTX 4070 Ti 135624
+15045%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	11 −2000%	231 +2000%
1440p	1−2 −14900%	150 +14900%
4K	0−1	96

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	3.46
1440p	no data	5.33
4K	no data	8.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3083%	190−200 +3083%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7767%	236 +7767%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3083%	190−200 +3083%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3533%	109 +3533%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −14275%	575 +14275%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −3020%	150−160 +3020%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3083%	190−200 +3083%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −3000%	93 +3000%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1800%	152 +1800%
Fortnite	0−1	300−350
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −11725%	473 +11725%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −2588%	210−220 +2588%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −3020%	150−160 +3020%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −3380%	170−180 +3380%
World of Tanks	16−18 −1644%	270−280 +1644%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −3083%	190−200 +3083%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2667%	83 +2667%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1813%	150−160 +1813%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −10150%	410 +10150%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 −2588%	210−220 +2588%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	3−4 −5733%	170−180 +5733%
World of Tanks	1−2 −51500%	500−550 +51500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1667%	53 +1667%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −3900%	160−170 +3900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −4800%	190−200 +4800%
Valorant	5−6 −8060%	400−450 +8060%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −20800%	200−210 +20800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	90−95
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1100%	24 +1100%
Dota 2	14−16 −1407%	226 +1407%
Valorant	1−2 −23900%	240−250 +23900%