Radeon RX 5900 XT vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameMach32Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4352
Core clock speed10 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1735 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data471.9
Floating-point processing powerno data15.1 TFLOPS
ROPs196
TMUsno data272

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 4.0 x16
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s672.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 Ultimate (12_1)
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNoneno data

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 7 nm

RX 5900 XT has a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 11329% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Radeon RX 5900 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 73 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or Radeon RX 5900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.