Radeon R7 A360 vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1031
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameMach32Meso
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1993 (33 years ago)5 May 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed10 MHz1100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data27.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.864 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUsno data24
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLNone4.6
OpenCLNone2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 5 May 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 800 nm 28 nm

R7 A360 has an age advantage of 22 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2757% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and Radeon R7 A360. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 A360 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 10 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate Radeon R7 A360 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Ultra Pro or Radeon R7 A360, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.