GeForce Go 7400T vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCurie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameMach32G72
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 January 1993 (31 year ago)1 February 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed10 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistorsno data112 million
Manufacturing process technology800 nm90 nm
Texture fill rateno data1.800
ROPs12
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceVLBPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeVRAMGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz450 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.0 MB/s7.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNone9.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLNone2.1
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 1993 1 February 2006
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 800 nm 90 nm

Go 7400T has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 788.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro and GeForce Go 7400T. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7400T is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro
Graphics Ultra Pro
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400T
GeForce Go 7400T

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.