Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameMach32Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1992 (32 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16384
Core clock speed10 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology700 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data2400 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,638
Floating-point processing powerno data52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs1no data
TMUsno data1024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceISA 16 BitPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDRAMHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed10 MHz1565 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 MB/s3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 700 nm 10 nm

Data Center GPU Max Subsystem has a 6553500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Ultra Pro ISA and Data Center GPU Max Subsystem. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Graphics Ultra Pro ISA is a desktop card while Data Center GPU Max Subsystem is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Graphics Ultra Pro ISA
Graphics Ultra Pro ISA
Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Graphics Ultra Pro ISA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 81 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max Subsystem on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.