Radeon RX Vega 3 vs Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated850
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Power efficiencyno data14.12
ArchitecturePowerVR SGX5 (2008−2011)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGMA 600Picasso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 May 2010 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4192
Core clock speed400 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1001 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data12.01
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3844 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2010 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2268 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 600 or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.