Radeon RX 6800 XT vs GeForce4 Ti 4800

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4800 and Radeon RX 6800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
2003
128 MB DDR
0.01

RX 6800 XT outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4800 by a whopping 650200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data50.65
Power efficiencyno data14.95
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV28 A1Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 March 2003 (21 year ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed300 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors36 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400648.0
Floating-point processing powerno data20.74 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 0.01
RX 6800 XT 65.03
+650200%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4800 5
RX 6800 XT 24995
+499800%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1203
1440p-0−1145
4K-0−1100

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.20
1440pno data4.48
4Kno data6.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 404
+0%
404
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 401
+0%
401
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Far Cry 5 58
+0%
58
+0%
Fortnite 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 355
+0%
355
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 150
+0%
150
+0%
Metro Exodus 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 173
+0%
173
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 302
+0%
302
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 356
+0%
356
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
+0%
120
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
World of Tanks 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+0%
222
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Metro Exodus 112
+0%
112
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 278
+0%
278
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 56
+0%
56
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+0%
53
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 133
+0%
133
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 153
+0%
153
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 65.03
Recency 15 March 2003 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RX 6800 XT has a 650200% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce4 Ti 4800
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
Radeon RX 6800 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 16 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 3659 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.