Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce4 Ti 4600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 Ti 4600 and Radeon RX 6800, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 Ti 4600
2002
128 MB DDR
0.01

RX 6800 outperforms GeForce4 Ti 4600 by a whopping 575300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking150343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.82
Power efficiencyno data15.84
ArchitectureKelvin (2001−2003)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV25 A3Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (22 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $579

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 and RX 6800 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed300 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2105 MHz
Number of transistors63 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400505.2
Floating-point processing powerno data16.17 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length216 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed324 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.37 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 0.01
RX 6800 57.54
+575300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 Ti 4600 5
RX 6800 22123
+442360%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1177
1440p-0−1100
4K-0−163

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.27
1440pno data5.79
4Kno data9.19

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 186
+0%
186
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 135
+0%
135
+0%
Elden Ring 156
+0%
156
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 148
+0%
148
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 415
+0%
415
+0%
Metro Exodus 164
+0%
164
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 87
+0%
87
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Elden Ring 255
+0%
255
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 341
+0%
341
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%
Metro Exodus 132
+0%
132
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 128
+0%
128
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 295
+0%
295
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 125
+0%
125
+0%
Elden Ring 149
+0%
149
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
World of Tanks 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70
+0%
70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 215
+0%
215
+0%
Metro Exodus 138
+0%
138
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Elden Ring 72
+0%
72
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 132
+0%
132
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
+0%
132
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 57.54
Recency 6 February 2002 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 7 nm

RX 6800 has a 575300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2042.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 Ti 4600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti 4600
GeForce4 Ti 4600
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20 votes

Rate GeForce4 Ti 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1969 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.