Radeon RX 560X Mobile vs GeForce4 MX 460

4 MX 420 4 MX 420 PCI 4 MX 440 4 MX 440-SE 4 MX 460
VS
Radeon RX 540 Radeon RX 540X Radeon RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550X Mobile Radeon RX 560 Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 570 Mobile Radeon RX 570X Mobile Radeon RX 580 Mobile Radeon RX 580X Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 MX 460 with Radeon RX 560X Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 MX 460
2002
64 MB DDR
0.01

RX 560X Mobile outperforms GeForce4 MX 460 by a whopping 92800% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce4 MX 460 GeForce4 MX 460
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1530442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.34
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Polaris 21
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)11 April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed300 MHz1275 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1202 MHz
Number of transistors29 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate1.20081.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed225 MHz1450 MHz
Memory bandwidth7.2 GB/s92.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−134

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
+0%
31
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Fortnite 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+0%
52
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50
+0%
50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 122
+0%
122
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Fortnite 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 36
+0%
36
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 42
+0%
42
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+0%
36
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+0%
13
+0%
Dota 2 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 38
+0%
38
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30
+0%
30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+0%
22
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 33
+0%
33
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 9.29
Recency 6 February 2002 11 April 2018
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

RX 560X Mobile has a 92800% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 560X Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 460 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 460 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 560X Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460
GeForce4 MX 460
AMD Radeon RX 560X Mobile
Radeon RX 560X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 MX 460 GeForce4 MX 460
vs
RX 7650 GRE Radeon RX 7650 GRE
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
vs
GTX 765M SLI GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce4 MX 460 GeForce4 MX 460
vs
R9 290X2 Radeon R9 290X2
GeForce2 MX 400 NVIDIA MX 400
vs
GeForce4 MX 440-8x 440-8x
RX 6750 GRE 10 GB AMD RX 6750 GRE 10 GB
vs
GeForce4 MX 440-8x 440-8x
RTX 3050 4 GB NVIDIA RTX 3050 4 GB
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 440
B200 SXM 192 GB NVIDIA SXM 192 GB
vs
GeForce4 MX 440 440
Tegra 2 Tegra 2
vs
GeForce4 MX 440-SE 440-SE
RTX 5090 D NVIDIA RTX 5090 D
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4400 4400
RX 6750 GRE AMD RX 6750 GRE
vs
GeForce4 Ti 4600 4600
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
GeForce2 Ti Ti
A100 SXM4 80 GB NVIDIA SXM4 80 GB
vs
GeForce3 Ti200 Ti200
Arc 7 A730M Intel 7 A730M
vs
GeForce3 Ti200 Ti200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 11 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 418 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560X Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 460 or Radeon RX 560X Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.