UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce4 MX 420

#ad 
Buy
4 MX 420 4 MX 420 PCI 4 MX 440 4 MX 440-SE 4 MX 460
VS
#ad 
Buy
UHD Graphics 710 UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 MX 420 and UHD Graphics 750, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce4 MX 420
2002
64 MB SDR
0.01

UHD Graphics 750 outperforms GeForce4 MX 420 by a whopping 38700% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GeForce4 MX 420 GeForce4 MX 420
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1524676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.52
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNV17 A3Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 February 2002 (23 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed250 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors29 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00020.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce4 MX 420 0.01
UHD Graphics 750 3.88
+38700%
  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 MX 420 4
UHD Graphics 750 1733
+43225%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.01 3.88
Recency 6 February 2002 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 750 has a 38700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 420 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 420
GeForce4 MX 420
Intel UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 750
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce4 MX 420 GeForce4 MX 420
vs
R5 340 OEM Radeon R5 340 OEM
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
vs
ATI HD 5830 Radeon HD 5830
GeForce4 MX 420 GeForce4 MX 420
vs
HD 8570 OEM Rebrand Radeon HD 8570 OEM Rebrand
FX 5900 XT GeForce FX 5900 XT
vs
RTX 5090 RTX 5090
PCX 5900 GeForce PCX 5900
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
FX 5200 GeForce FX 5200
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
FX 5800 Ultra GeForce FX 5800 Ultra
vs
RTX 3090 Ti RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE
vs
RX 8800 XT RX 8800 XT
GeForce4 MX 440 GeForce4 MX 440
vs
RX 6800 RX 6800
GeForce4 MX 440 GeForce4 MX 440
vs
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile
GeForce4 MX 440-SE GeForce4 MX 440-SE
vs
RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce4 Ti 4200 GeForce4 Ti 4200
vs
RX 8800 XT RX 8800 XT
GeForce2 Ti GeForce2 Ti
vs
RTX 4090 Ti RTX 4090 Ti

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4
23 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6
408 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce4 MX 420 or UHD Graphics 750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.