RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs GeForce4 MX 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce4 MX 4000 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce4 MX 4000
2003
128 MB DDR
0.01

RTX 4000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce4 MX 4000 by a whopping 639300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking151629
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.83
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV18 A4AD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date14 December 2003 (21 year ago)9 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed250 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors29 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate1.000417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs4192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s360.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce4 MX 4000 0.01
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 63.94
+639300%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce4 MX 4000 4
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 24645
+616025%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.01 63.94
Recency 14 December 2003 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has a 639300% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, a 15900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 MX 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce4 MX 4000 is a desktop card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 4000
GeForce4 MX 4000
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 939 votes

Rate GeForce4 MX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 42 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.