UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs GeForce4 440 Go

Place in the ranking	1521	546
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Celsius (1999−2005)	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code name	NV17 A5	Alder Lake Xe
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2002 (22 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2	64
Core clock speed	220 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	220 MHz	1400 MHz
Number of transistors	29 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	150 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	0.88	no data
ROPs	2	no data
TMUs	4	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface

AGP 4x

no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR	no data
Maximum RAM amount	64 MB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	220 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	7.04 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	8.0	12_1
OpenGL	1.3	no data
OpenCL	N/A	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	-0−1	21
1440p	-0−1	11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1700%	18 +1700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −600%	7 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −700%	32 +700%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 +0%	8 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −440%	27 +440%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −550%	26 +550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −567%	20−22 +567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −450%	21−24 +450%
World of Tanks	8−9 −1288%	110−120 +1288%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −540%	30−35 +540%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −1350%	55−60 +1350%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

0−1

35−40

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
Valorant	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Valorant	0−1	7−8

Full HD
Low Preset

Elden Ring

+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	19 +0%	19 +0%
Valorant	25 +0%	25 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	26 +0%	26 +0%
Elden Ring	16 +0%	16 +0%
Fortnite	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12 +0%	12 +0%
Metro Exodus	13 +0%	13 +0%
Valorant	18 +0%	18 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Dota 2	49 +0%	49 +0%
Valorant	22 +0%	22 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	6 +0%	6 +0%
Elden Ring	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	6 +0%	6 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
World of Tanks	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Metro Exodus	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Elden Ring	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Fortnite	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 1700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is ahead in 28 tests (46%)
there's a draw in 33 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.01	7.18
Recency	6 February 2002	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	150 nm	10 nm

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 71700% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 440 Go in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.