Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce4 4200 Go
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce4 4200 Go and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) outperforms GeForce4 4200 Go by a whopping 88100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1531 | 451 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | Xe LPG (2023) |
| GPU code name | NV28M | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 15 November 2002 (22 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6 | 4 |
| Core clock speed | 2 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 200 MHz | 1950 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 5 nm |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DDR | 12_2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 25 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−84900%
|
850−900
+84900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−84900%
|
850−900
+84900%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−84900%
|
850−900
+84900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−84900%
|
850−900
+84900%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−2400%
|
50
+2400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−467%
|
30−35
+467%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Atomic Heart | 1−2
−1500%
|
16
+1500%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 8−9
−88025%
|
7050−7100
+88025%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−88025%
|
7050−7100
+88025%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1850%
|
39
+1850%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−467%
|
30−35
+467%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−733%
|
24−27
+733%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1900%
|
20−22
+1900%
|
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−88025%
|
7050−7100
+88025%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−467%
|
30−35
+467%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4
−86567%
|
2600−2650
+86567%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−279%
|
90−95
+279%
|
1440p
High Preset
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 45−50 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 21−24 |
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−33.3%
|
20−22
+33.3%
|
| Valorant | 1−2
−84900%
|
850−900
+84900%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2
−900%
|
10−11
+900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−87400%
|
1750−1800
+87400%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 11
+0%
|
11
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 13
+0%
|
13
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24
+0%
|
24
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 15
+0%
|
15
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Atomic Heart | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Atomic Heart | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Atomic Heart | 8−9
+0%
|
8−9
+0%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
+0%
|
3−4
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 2400% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 16 tests (29%)
- there's a draw in 40 tests (71%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.01 | 8.82 |
| Recency | 15 November 2002 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 5 nm |
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 88100% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 year, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce4 4200 Go in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
