Radeon RX Vega 3 vs GeForce3 Ti200
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 776 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 79 |
| Architecture | Kelvin (2001−2003) | Vega (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV20 A5 | Vega Raven Ridge |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2001 (22 years ago) | 7 January 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 57 million | 4,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.400 | 12.13 |
| Floating-point performance | no data | 0.3882 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | IGP |
| Length | 183 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2001 | 7 January 2018 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 14 nm |
RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce3 Ti200 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce3 Ti200 is a desktop card while Radeon RX Vega 3 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
