GeForce2 Go vs GeForce3 Ti200
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1514 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.35 |
| Architecture | Kelvin (2001−2003) | Celsius (1999−2005) |
| GPU code name | NV20 A5 | NV11 B2 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 October 2001 (23 years ago) | 11 November 2000 (24 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Core clock speed | 175 MHz | 143 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 57 million | 20 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 2 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 1.400 | 0.57 |
| ROPs | 4 | 2 |
| TMUs | 8 | 4 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | AGP 4x |
| Length | 183 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 200 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 5.312 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 8.0 | 7.0 |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 1.2 |
| OpenCL | N/A | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2001 | 11 November 2000 |
| Chip lithography | 150 nm | 180 nm |
GeForce3 Ti200 has an age advantage of 10 months, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce3 Ti200 and GeForce2 Go. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce3 Ti200 is a desktop card while GeForce2 Go is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
