Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce2 MX + nForce 420

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated184
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data18.53
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameCrush11Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 June 2001 (24 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed175 MHz1489 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors20 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data135 Watt
Texture fill rate0.7345.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.06 TFLOPS
ROPs264
TMUs4144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L0 Cacheno data576 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared10 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared160 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2001 31 May 2021
Chip lithography 180 nm 7 nm

RX 6700M has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 2471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 and Radeon RX 6700M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6700M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 134 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 MX + nForce 420 or Radeon RX 6700M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.