Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce2 MX 400

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated216
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data58.29
Power efficiencyno data16.11
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 March 2001 (23 years ago)19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed200 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistors20 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data107 Watt
Texture fill rate0.8180.2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs464
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm

RX 6500 XT has an age advantage of 20 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 400 and Radeon RX 6500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 400
GeForce2 MX 400
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 115 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3213 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.