Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce2 MX 200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.25
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameNV11 B2DG1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date3 March 2001 (23 years ago)31 October 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed175 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors20 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology180 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate0.779.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs224
TMUs448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x4
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRLPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 March 2001 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe MAX Graphics has an age advantage of 19 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 MX 200 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 MX 200 is a desktop card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce2 MX 200
GeForce2 MX 200
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 29 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 254 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.