Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs GeForce2 Go
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Celsius (1999−2005) | GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) |
| GPU code name | NV11 B2 | Vega 10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 11 November 2000 (24 years ago) | 7 August 2017 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $699 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | no data | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 143 MHz | 1408 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1668 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 20 million | 12,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 345 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 0.57 | 427.0 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 13.66 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 4 | 256 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | AGP 4x | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 282 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR | HBM2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 2048 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 166 MHz | 945 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 5.312 GB/s | 483.8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 7.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 1.2 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 11 November 2000 | 7 August 2017 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 345 Watt |
GeForce2 Go has 17150% lower power consumption.
RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go and Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce2 Go is a notebook card while Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
