Radeon Picasso Embedded vs GeForce2 Go 200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Picasso
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2001 (25 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed143 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors20 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5715.61
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4996 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 (12_1)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 10 Watt

GeForce2 Go 200 has 400% lower power consumption.

Picasso Embedded, on the other hand, has a 1186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 200 and Radeon Picasso Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 200 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Picasso Embedded is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon Picasso Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Go 200 or Radeon Picasso Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.