Radeon HD 7560G IGP vs GeForce2 Go 100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameNV11 B2Devastator Lite
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date6 February 2001 (25 years ago)15 May 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed125 MHz496 MHz
Boost clock speedno data760 MHz
Number of transistors20 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.512.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3891 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width32 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed166 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.011.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGL1.24.4
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 180 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce2 Go 100 has 1650% lower power consumption.

HD 7560G IGP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 463% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 100 and Radeon HD 7560G IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7560G IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Go 100 or Radeon HD 7560G IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.