Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB vs GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, including specs and performance data.
RTX 5090 Mobile outperforms RX 9060 XT 16GB by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 16 | 68 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 57.40 | no data |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) | RDNA 4 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GB203 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 March 2025 (less than a year ago) | 2 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 10496 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 990 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 2530 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 45,600 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 496.9 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 31.8 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 112 | no data |
| TMUs | 328 | no data |
| Tensor Cores | 328 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 82 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | - |
| CUDA | 12.0 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 173
+24.5%
| 139
−24.5%
|
| 1440p | 118
+81.5%
| 65
−81.5%
|
| 4K | 83
+93%
| 43
−93%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+22.8%
|
260−270
−22.8%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 180−190
+53.7%
|
120−130
−53.7%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 220−230
+59%
|
140−150
−59%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 390
+48.3%
|
260−270
−48.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 180−190
+53.7%
|
120−130
−53.7%
|
| Fortnite | 300−350
+39.2%
|
210−220
−39.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 210−220
+38.6%
|
150−160
−38.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1.2%
|
170−180
−1.2%
|
| Valorant | 400−450
+58.9%
|
270−280
−58.9%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 301
+14.4%
|
260−270
−14.4%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 280−290
+0%
|
280−290
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 180−190
+53.7%
|
120−130
−53.7%
|
| Fortnite | 300−350
+39.2%
|
210−220
−39.2%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 210−220
+38.6%
|
150−160
−38.6%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 172
+14.7%
|
150−160
−14.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1.2%
|
170−180
−1.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 300−350
+24.2%
|
260
−24.2%
|
| Valorant | 400−450
+58.9%
|
270−280
−58.9%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 180−190
+53.7%
|
120−130
−53.7%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1.2%
|
170−180
−1.2%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 219
+64.7%
|
133
−64.7%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 300−350
+39.2%
|
210−220
−39.2%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 224
+62.3%
|
130−140
−62.3%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 500−550
+44.9%
|
350−400
−44.9%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 157
+48.1%
|
100−110
−48.1%
|
| Valorant | 450−500
+57.5%
|
300−350
−57.5%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 110−120
+71.9%
|
60−65
−71.9%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 168
+71.4%
|
98
−71.4%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 150−160
+9.4%
|
130−140
−9.4%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+66.7%
|
60−65
−66.7%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 176
+50.4%
|
110−120
−50.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 122
+43.5%
|
85
−43.5%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+13%
|
290−300
−13%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+80%
|
30−33
−80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+18.5%
|
80−85
−18.5%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 75−80
+9.7%
|
70−75
−9.7%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 190−200
+0%
|
190−200
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Metro Exodus | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
This is how RTX 5090 Mobile and RX 9060 XT 16GB compete in popular games:
- RTX 5090 Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
- RTX 5090 Mobile is 82% faster in 1440p
- RTX 5090 Mobile is 93% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5090 Mobile is 80% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5090 Mobile is ahead in 35 tests (65%)
- there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 71.54 | 48.29 |
| Recency | 27 March 2025 | 2 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 24 GB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
RTX 5090 Mobile has a 48.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.
RX 9060 XT 16GB, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
