Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce RTX 4090

Place in the ranking	1	68
Place by popularity	6	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	18.80	46.23
Power efficiency	15.39	13.36
Architecture	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	AD102	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,599	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 GRE has 146% better value for money than RTX 4090.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16384	2560
Core clock speed	2235 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2520 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	76,300 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	1,290	413.0
Floating-point processing power	82.58 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	176	64
TMUs	512	160
Tensor Cores	512	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	128	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	304 mm	267 mm
Width	3-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 16-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1313 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	1.01 TB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.8	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.9	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4090 100.00
+107%

RX 6750 GRE 48.24

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4090 38588
+107%

RX 6750 GRE 18613

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	268 +123%	120−130 −123%
1440p	206 +117%	95−100 −117%
4K	145 +123%	65−70 −123%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.97	4.58
1440p	7.76	5.78
4K	11.03	8.45

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

225
+125%

100−105

−125%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	235 +114%	110−120 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	287 +121%	130−140 −121%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +122%	110−120 −122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	222 +122%	100−105 −122%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +115%	55−60 −115%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +112%	95−100 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +108%	140−150 −108%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +120%	160−170 −120%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +121%	70−75 −121%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +125%	55−60 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	450−500 +110%	220−230 −110%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +120%	70−75 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	200−210 +114%	95−100 −114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	248 +125%	110−120 −125%
Battlefield 5	240−250 +122%	110−120 −122%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	214 +114%	100−105 −114%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +115%	55−60 −115%
Far Cry New Dawn	200−210 +112%	95−100 −112%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +108%	140−150 −108%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	350−400 +120%	160−170 −120%
Metro Exodus	150−160 +121%	70−75 −121%
Red Dead Redemption 2	120−130 +125%	55−60 −125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	548 +111%	260−270 −111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	240−250 +119%	110−120 −119%
Watch Dogs: Legion	150−160 +120%	70−75 −120%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	179 +111%	85−90 −111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	220 +120%	100−105 −120%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	120−130 +118%	55−60 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	210 +110%	100−105 −110%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +115%	55−60 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	290−300 +108%	140−150 −108%
Hitman 3	120−130 +115%	60−65 −115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	394 +107%	190−200 −107%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	541 +108%	260−270 −108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	305 +118%	140−150 −118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	153 +119%	70−75 −119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+125%

55−60
−125%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	160−170 +108%	80−85 −108%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +124%	50−55 −124%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	155 +121%	70−75 −121%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	183 +115%	85−90 −115%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +134%	35−40 −134%
Cyberpunk 2077	154 +120%	70−75 −120%
Far Cry 5	80−85 +110%	40−45 −110%
Forza Horizon 4	270−280 +108%	130−140 −108%
Hitman 3	130−140 +112%	65−70 −112%
Horizon Zero Dawn	388 +116%	180−190 −116%
Metro Exodus	152 +117%	70−75 −117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	504 +110%	240−250 −110%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	268 +123%	120−130 −123%
Watch Dogs: Legion	240−250 +118%	110−120 −118%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+115%

60−65
−115%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +120%	40−45 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +130%	30−33 −130%
Hitman 3	80−85 +108%	40−45 −108%
Horizon Zero Dawn	105 +110%	50−55 −110%
Metro Exodus	140−150 +118%	65−70 −118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	281 +116%	130−140 −116%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120 +118%	55−60 −118%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	120 +118%	55−60 −118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +117%	24−27 −117%
Cyberpunk 2077	80 +129%	35−40 −129%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +108%	24−27 −108%
Forza Horizon 4	250−260 +113%	120−130 −113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	282 +117%	130−140 −117%
Watch Dogs: Legion	117 +113%	55−60 −113%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

+122%

50−55
−122%

This is how RTX 4090 and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 is 123% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 is 117% faster in 1440p
RTX 4090 is 123% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	100.00	48.24
Recency	20 September 2022	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	24 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	450 Watt	250 Watt