RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4090 Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
72.21
+59.2%

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms RTX 2000 Ada Generation by an impressive 59% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1876
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data84.16
Power efficiency41.4244.60
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD103AD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (2 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97282816
Core clock speed1335 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate515.3187.4
Floating-point processing power32.98 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs11248
TMUs30488
Tensor Cores30488
Ray Tracing Cores7622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4090 Mobile 72.21
+59.2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 45.35

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4090 Mobile 27761
+59.2%
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17435

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD176
+60%
110−120
−60%
1440p133
+66.3%
80−85
−66.3%
4K81
+62%
50−55
−62%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.90
1440pno data8.11
4Kno data12.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220
+69.2%
130−140
−69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 156
+64.2%
95−100
−64.2%
Elden Ring 189
+71.8%
110−120
−71.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+68.2%
85−90
−68.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+77.5%
40−45
−77.5%
Forza Horizon 4 398
+65.8%
240−250
−65.8%
Metro Exodus 148
+64.4%
90−95
−64.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+65%
80−85
−65%
Valorant 350−400
+62.6%
230−240
−62.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 132
+65%
80−85
−65%
Cyberpunk 2077 68
+70%
40−45
−70%
Dota 2 174
+74%
100−105
−74%
Elden Ring 336
+60%
210−220
−60%
Far Cry 5 136
+60%
85−90
−60%
Fortnite 280−290
+68.2%
170−180
−68.2%
Forza Horizon 4 387
+61.3%
240−250
−61.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+62%
100−105
−62%
Metro Exodus 138
+62.4%
85−90
−62.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+65.4%
130−140
−65.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 130−140
+65%
80−85
−65%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+74%
100−105
−74%
Valorant 262
+63.8%
160−170
−63.8%
World of Tanks 270−280
+64.1%
170−180
−64.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+67.1%
70−75
−67.1%
Counter-Strike 2 123
+64%
75−80
−64%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+80%
35−40
−80%
Dota 2 187
+70%
110−120
−70%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+60%
85−90
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 369
+60.4%
230−240
−60.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+65.4%
130−140
−65.4%
Valorant 350−400
+62.6%
230−240
−62.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 138
+62.4%
85−90
−62.4%
Elden Ring 219
+68.5%
130−140
−68.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+63.5%
85−90
−63.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+75%
100−105
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 90−95
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%
World of Tanks 516
+72%
300−310
−72%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+74%
50−55
−74%
Counter-Strike 2 90
+63.6%
55−60
−63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+74.1%
27−30
−74.1%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+60%
100−105
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 294
+63.3%
180−190
−63.3%
Metro Exodus 128
+60%
80−85
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+64%
100−105
−64%
Valorant 300−350
+60.5%
200−210
−60.5%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 63
+80%
35−40
−80%
Dota 2 172
+72%
100−105
−72%
Elden Ring 112
+60%
70−75
−60%
Grand Theft Auto V 174
+74%
100−105
−74%
Metro Exodus 82
+64%
50−55
−64%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200−210
+60.8%
130−140
−60.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+60%
40−45
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
+74%
100−105
−74%
World of Tanks 314
+65.3%
190−200
−65.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+65.5%
55−60
−65.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Dota 2 179
+62.7%
110−120
−62.7%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+61.5%
65−70
−61.5%
Fortnite 95−100
+60%
60−65
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 156
+64.2%
95−100
−64.2%
Valorant 180−190
+69.1%
110−120
−69.1%

This is how RTX 4090 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 60% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 66% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 62% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 72.21 45.35
Recency 3 January 2023 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has a 59.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 71.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 2000 Ada Generation in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 687 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.