RTX A500 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated312
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data20.06
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameAD103GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97282048
Core clock speed930 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology4 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate442.3113.3
Floating-point processing power28.31 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs30464
Tensor Cores30464
Ray Tracing Cores7616

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s112.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.98.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 January 2023 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 4090 Max-Q has an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q and RTX A500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q is a notebook card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q
NVIDIA RTX A500
RTX A500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 149 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 138 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.