ROG Ally GPU vs GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5not rated
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation38.13no data
Power efficiency19.20no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD103Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10240256
Core clock speed2295 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed2550 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate816.040.00
Floating-point processing power52.22 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs1128
TMUs32016
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores804

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length310 mm280 mm
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XLPDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1438 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth736.3 GB/s51.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 30 Watt

ROG Ally GPU has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 966.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER and ROG Ally GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
AMD ROG Ally GPU
ROG Ally GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 1695 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate ROG Ally GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.