Radeon 780M vs GeForce RTX 4070

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070
2023
12 GB GDDR6X, 200 Watt
69.90
+282%

RTX 4070 outperforms 780M by a whopping 282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking20302
Place by popularity3249
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.23no data
Power efficiency23.9683.73
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 April 2023 (1 year ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888768
Core clock speed1920 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2475 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate455.4129.6
Floating-point processing power29.15 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs18448
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores4612

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length240 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1313 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 69.90
+282%
Radeon 780M 18.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 26936
+282%
Radeon 780M 7060

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4070 59969
+369%
Radeon 780M 12785

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 4070 128530
+209%
Radeon 780M 41622

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4070 43824
+449%
Radeon 780M 7987

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4070 193559
+302%
Radeon 780M 48112

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4070 773592
+80%
Radeon 780M 429810

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD219
+508%
36
−508%
1440p124
+520%
20
−520%
4K76
+485%
13
−485%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.74no data
1440p4.83no data
4K7.88no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 216
+454%
39
−454%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 140−150
+251%
40−45
−251%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+272%
60−65
−272%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+222%
35−40
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 174
+461%
31
−461%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+172%
40−45
−172%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+249%
45−50
−249%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+107%
110−120
−107%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+182%
90−95
−182%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+146%
60−65
−146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+149%
45−50
−149%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 290−300
+390%
60−65
−390%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+75.9%
85−90
−75.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 140−150
+251%
40−45
−251%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Battlefield 5 220−230
+272%
60−65
−272%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+222%
35−40
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+496%
24
−496%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+172%
40−45
−172%
Far Cry New Dawn 170−180
+249%
45−50
−249%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+107%
110−120
−107%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 250−260
+182%
90−95
−182%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+146%
60−65
−146%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+149%
45−50
−149%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 376
+596%
54
−596%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+257%
40−45
−257%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+75.9%
85−90
−75.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 140−150
+251%
40−45
−251%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 110−120
+222%
35−40
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+457%
23
−457%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+172%
40−45
−172%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+107%
110−120
−107%
Hitman 3 120−130
+269%
35−40
−269%
Horizon Zero Dawn 293
+453%
53
−453%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 322
+600%
46
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170
+486%
29
−486%
Watch Dogs: Legion 124
+589%
18
−589%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+149%
45−50
−149%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+371%
35−40
−371%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+296%
27−30
−296%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+332%
18−20
−332%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+456%
16−18
−456%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+310%
20−22
−310%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+710%
10−11
−710%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+290%
21−24
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+171%
100−105
−171%
Hitman 3 100−110
+364%
21−24
−364%
Horizon Zero Dawn 222
+500%
35−40
−500%
Metro Exodus 143
+321%
30−35
−321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 222
+594%
32
−594%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+530%
20
−530%
Watch Dogs: Legion 230−240
+117%
110−120
−117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 110−120
+283%
30−33
−283%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+389%
18−20
−389%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+393%
14−16
−393%
Hitman 3 60−65
+336%
14−16
−336%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+140%
90−95
−140%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+484%
18−20
−484%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115
+667%
15
−667%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55−60
+427%
10−12
−427%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60
+511%
9−10
−511%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+420%
10−11
−420%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+1100%
3−4
−1100%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+384%
24−27
−384%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
+612%
17
−612%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50
+525%
8−9
−525%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 75−80
+375%
16−18
−375%

This is how RTX 4070 and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 508% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 520% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 485% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 is 1100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 surpassed Radeon 780M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 69.90 18.32
Recency 12 April 2023 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 15 Watt

RTX 4070 has a 281.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop card while Radeon 780M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 9325 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1547 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.