ATI Radeon X1650 SE vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6not rated
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation55.29no data
Power efficiency21.19no data
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameAD104RV515
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7680no data
Core clock speed2310 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHzno data
Number of transistors35,800 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate626.42.540
Floating-point processing power40.09 TFLOPSno data
ROPs804
TMUs2404
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores60no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.73.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Ti 31798
+44686%
ATI X1650 SE 71

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 4 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 27 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 SE, on the other hand, has 955.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon X1650 SE. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
ATI Radeon X1650 SE
Radeon X1650 SE

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6720 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon X1650 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.