Radeon PRO W7900 vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 Ti with Radeon PRO W7900, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 Ti
2023
12 GB GDDR6X, 285 Watt
82.58
+9%

RTX 4070 Ti outperforms PRO W7900 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking613
Place by popularity95not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.9016.79
Power efficiency19.8617.61
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (1 year ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $3,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4070 Ti has 191% better value for money than PRO W7900.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76806144
Core clock speed2310 MHz1855 MHz
Boost clock speed2610 MHz2495 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)285 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate626.4958.1
Floating-point processing power40.09 TFLOPS61.32 TFLOPS
ROPs80192
TMUs240384
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores6096

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length285 mm280 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4070 Ti 82.58
+9%
PRO W7900 75.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 Ti 31820
+9%
PRO W7900 29204

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD232
+10.5%
210−220
−10.5%
1440p152
+16.9%
130−140
−16.9%
4K96
+12.9%
85−90
−12.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.4419.04
1440p5.2630.76
4K8.3247.05

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 236
+12.4%
210−220
−12.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+12%
150−160
−12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
−9.3%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+10.9%
220−230
−10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 218
+9%
200−210
−9%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+11.7%
180−190
−11.7%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+10.4%
230−240
−10.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+12.3%
260−270
−12.3%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+10.7%
140−150
−10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 350−400
+20.7%
300−310
−20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+10%
140−150
−10%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+12%
150−160
−12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
−9.3%
Battlefield 5 240−250
+10.9%
220−230
−10.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 185
+15.6%
160−170
−15.6%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry New Dawn 200−210
+11.7%
180−190
−11.7%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+10.4%
230−240
−10.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290−300
+12.3%
260−270
−12.3%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+10.7%
140−150
−10.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 473
+18.3%
400−450
−18.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 180−190
+15%
160−170
−15%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150−160
+10%
140−150
−10%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 160−170
+12%
150−160
−12%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 150−160
+9.3%
140−150
−9.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120−130
+9.1%
110−120
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 167
+11.3%
150−160
−11.3%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+10.4%
230−240
−10.4%
Hitman 3 120−130
+17.3%
110−120
−17.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 351
+17%
300−310
−17%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 410
+17.1%
350−400
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 222
+11%
200−210
−11%
Watch Dogs: Legion 152
+16.9%
130−140
−16.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+12.7%
110−120
−12.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 160−170
+10.7%
150−160
−10.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120
+12%
100−105
−12%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80−85
+9.3%
75−80
−9.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 105
+10.5%
95−100
−10.5%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+12%
75−80
−12%
Forza Horizon 4 270−280
+12.9%
240−250
−12.9%
Hitman 3 120−130
+10%
110−120
−10%
Horizon Zero Dawn 273
+9.2%
250−260
−9.2%
Metro Exodus 148
+13.8%
130−140
−13.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 280
+12%
250−260
−12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+12.1%
140−150
−12.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 240−250
+9.1%
220−230
−9.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 120−130
+14.5%
110−120
−14.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+10%
80−85
−10%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Hitman 3 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 220−230
+13%
200−210
−13%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+17.5%
120−130
−17.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70−75
+10.8%
65−70
−10.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+20%
40−45
−20%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+11.1%
45−50
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+10.7%
150−160
−10.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140
+16.7%
120−130
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+13.3%
60−65
−13.3%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%

This is how RTX 4070 Ti and PRO W7900 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Ti is 10% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 17% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Ti is 13% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 82.58 75.79
Recency 3 January 2023 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 4 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 285 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 4070 Ti has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 3.5% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and Radeon PRO W7900.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon PRO W7900 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
Radeon PRO W7900

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 6995 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 75 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.