Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4070 SUPER
2024
12 GB GDDR6X, 220 Watt
67.26
+637%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by a whopping 637% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12443
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.57no data
Power efficiency24.1524.04
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)no data
GPU code nameAD104no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date8 January 2024 (1 year ago)26 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71681536
Core clock speed1980 MHzno data
Boost clock speed2475 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate554.4no data
Floating-point processing power35.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs80no data
TMUs224no data
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Cores56no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XLPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1313 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4070 SUPER 67.26
+637%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 9.13

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 4070 SUPER 68373
+977%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 4070 SUPER 48876
+677%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 4070 SUPER 171098
+390%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 34890

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD217
+578%
32
−578%
1440p134
+857%
14
−857%
4K82
+720%
10−12
−720%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.76no data
1440p4.47no data
4K7.30no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+817%
24−27
−817%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+515%
50−55
−515%
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+880%
20−22
−880%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+817%
24−27
−817%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+323%
40−45
−323%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+515%
50−55
−515%
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+820%
20−22
−820%
Far Cry 5 203
+577%
30
−577%
Fortnite 300−350
+412%
55−60
−412%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+581%
40−45
−581%
Forza Horizon 5 200−210
+587%
30−33
−587%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+392%
35−40
−392%
Valorant 400−450
+357%
90−95
−357%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 220−230
+817%
24−27
−817%
Battlefield 5 180−190
+323%
40−45
−323%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+515%
50−55
−515%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+86.6%
140−150
−86.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 159
+695%
20−22
−695%
Far Cry 5 200
+614%
28
−614%
Fortnite 300−350
+412%
55−60
−412%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+581%
40−45
−581%
Forza Horizon 5 200−210
+587%
30−33
−587%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+394%
35
−394%
Metro Exodus 185
+825%
20−22
−825%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+392%
35−40
−392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 412
+930%
40
−930%
Valorant 400−450
+357%
90−95
−357%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+323%
40−45
−323%
Cyberpunk 2077 144
+620%
20−22
−620%
Far Cry 5 190
+631%
26
−631%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+581%
40−45
−581%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+392%
35−40
−392%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 201
+958%
19
−958%
Valorant 400−450
+357%
90−95
−357%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+412%
55−60
−412%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+1172%
18−20
−1172%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+579%
75−80
−579%
Grand Theft Auto V 148
+887%
15
−887%
Metro Exodus 118
+973%
10−12
−973%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
−250%
Valorant 450−500
+341%
110−120
−341%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+668%
24−27
−668%
Cyberpunk 2077 92
+1050%
8−9
−1050%
Far Cry 5 183
+771%
21−24
−771%
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+979%
24−27
−979%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+863%
16−18
−863%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 150−160
+619%
21−24
−619%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 70−75
+788%
8−9
−788%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+2475%
4−5
−2475%
Grand Theft Auto V 166
+690%
21−24
−690%
Metro Exodus 74
+1380%
5−6
−1380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+1109%
10−12
−1109%
Valorant 300−350
+538%
50−55
−538%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+1033%
12−14
−1033%
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+2475%
4−5
−2475%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Far Cry 5 103
+930%
10−11
−930%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+1182%
16−18
−1182%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+967%
9−10
−967%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+778%
9−10
−778%

This is how RTX 4070 SUPER and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 578% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 857% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 720% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4070 SUPER is 2475% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 SUPER surpassed Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 67.26 9.13
Recency 8 January 2024 26 October 2023
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 636.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 633.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 5051 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 11 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER or Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.